national security

Expert analysis of how the first-ever case put before the long-dormant Alien Terrorist Removal Court came to a close.

States should treat spyware governance as a top-tier political priority and work toward a binding, enforceable regulatory framework.

We asked experts with deep personal and professional ties to the post-9/11 era: how did 9/11 shape your path, and how does it continue to shape us 25 years later?

Ryan Goodman and Tess Bridgeman are joined by Daniel Fried and Nicholas Rasmussen to discuss the enduring impact of 9/11 on U.S. counterterrorism and foreign policy.

For the United States to take the lead in AI cyber operations capabilities, government and industry must create appropriate safeguards.

Iceland may seek European integration partly as a hedge against a more capricious and unpredictable United States, and others may follow.

Congress should build a durable private-public standing forum in the next National Defense Authorization Act.

This syllabus supplement offers curated articles intended to be combined with traditional casebooks in a law or higher ed classroom.

This syllabus supplement offers curated articles intended to be combined with traditional casebooks in a law or higher ed classroom.

Anthropic v. Department of War reveals why courts must distinguish genuine national security judgments from pretextual ones and how to do it.

All highly capable AI models should be regulated through pre-deployment and ongoing testing. But any safety regime that works for domestic models should work for Chinese ones.

DOJ's first-ever use of the Alien Terrorist Removal Court raises due process concerns, but could offer more legitimacy than current immigration proceedings.