The Supreme Court Should Rethink Deference to the Executive in the Travel Ban Case

by and

Former White House Counsel Neil Eggleston, and Amanda Elbogen write that the Justices should not provide the customary deference to the Executive Branch when it comes to the Travel Ban 3.0, which was hardly the product of a customary administrative decision-making process. Full Story

Latest Stories

At a Crossroad: The Int’l Criminal Court’s Afghanistan Probe and the International Law Commission

by

If Mattis Meant to Assert Self-Defense for the Syria Strike, He Was Wrong

by

The Supreme Court Should Rethink Deference to the Executive in the Travel Ban Case

by and

The Early Edition: April 19, 2018

by

The Twenty-Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution: A Reader’s Guide

by , , , , , and

The Extent and Validity of Yemen’s Consent to the US’s Use of Force

by , , , and