Cyber

For the United States to take the lead in AI cyber operations capabilities, government and industry must create appropriate safeguards.

As the U.S. and China compete on AI, concepts such as export controls can no longer determine who leads in that or across a range of other emerging technology.

Neither banning Chinese advanced AI models nor ignoring their risks to national security will serve American interests.

Congress should build a durable private-public standing forum in the next National Defense Authorization Act.

This syllabus supplement offers curated articles intended to be combined with traditional casebooks in a law or higher ed classroom.

International law must adapt to AI-enabled ransomware threats to ensure accountability for the cumulative injury inflicted by their campaigns.

A proposed bill would help ensure that antitrust law does not deter legitimate collaboration on mitigating AI security risks.

Recent U.N. discussions add a new forum on global governance and international norms on military uses of A.I.

Members of the Senate are taking steps to regulate and restrict how the Department of Defense develops and uses AI in its operations.

The U.S. needs to lead a new export control regime -- coordinating with its partners and allies -- to constrain China’s ability to produce advanced and foundational chips.

With risk-based personnel vetting practices, U.S. AI labs can keep recruiting the world’s best researchers while safeguarding national security.

The U.S. shift away from a rules-based export regime amid a race for AI leadership is causing India to hedge against a heavy reliance on American technology.