Russia-Ukraine

A collection of syllabus supplements which offer curated articles intended to be combined with traditional course books in a law school or higher education classroom.

This syllabus supplement offers curated articles intended to be combined with traditional casebooks in a law or higher ed classroom.

Ukraine's survival in the face of Russia's aggression demonstrates how U.S. support to civil society and democratic institutions becomes a national security asset.

Civilian infrastructure is not targetable merely because it is economically significant or politically useful to strike, but only when it offers a definite military advantage.

It is an open question whether the Trump administration seeks to rebalance NATO or disengage the U.S. from European security.

In post-conflict settings undergoing digital transformation, the governance of civilian AI systems is a key condition for sustaining peace.

Russia’s "passportization" campaign in occupied Ukraine demonstrates how citizenship policy can be manipulated as a modern instrument of hybrid warfare.

There is a widening gap between international humanitarian law and the realities of civilians affected by armed conflicts.

The strike illustrates a grim pattern in Russia’s conduct of the war – the systematic destruction of Ukrainian religious and cultural sites.

Russia’s drone incursions into E.U. territory raise important questions about how unintended engagements are regulated under international law.

The tribunal to prosecute Russia's crime of aggression seeks to close one of the most enduring gaps in international criminal law and strengthen the U.N. Charter.

Ukraine is rewriting the rules of air power, replacing stockpiles of weapons as key factors in warfare with quantity, speed, and the ability to learn faster than the enemy.