Meta

This series aims to set out what a meaningful, multistakeholder, and globally relevant AI accountability mechanism should look like.

Advanced AI systems have crossed an important threshold from commercial software to technologies viewed as strategic national assets.

As the risks of artificial intelligence continue to mount, the expert analysis in this series engages the fundamental question of what ought to happen when AI risks manifest into…

The introduction of Muse, Meta's new 24/7 AI assistant, carries significant implications for users' autonomy and data privacy.

If tech leaders are serious about oversight to curtail AI risk, they will need to endow evaluators with independence, information, money, and clout to enforce decisions.

U.S. tech companies should take action to protect the Afghan women and girls who rely on their platforms for online education.

A recent Meta Oversight Board Advisory Opinion marks a positive step in tackling misinformation and protecting digital rights on social media.

AI governance in Africa is reproducing extraction dynamics at a continental scale through the guise of development.

In a functioning democracy, citizens don’t fear who is in power because rules, not rulers, hold sway. The same principle should govern the future of AI.

The case of Meta's platforms in India reminds us that in digital governance, rights are not only written into policy, but must be written into design.

By abandoning proactive content moderation, platforms are accelerating a global slide toward censorship — the very outcome they claim to oppose.

The Oversight Board's Kolovrat decision reveals more than a dispute over a symbol—it lays bare the deep fault lines in Meta’s content moderation architecture.