Meta

Early efforts to enforce the Digital Services Act shed light on what is at least theoretically possible in the U.S.

Companies ought to proceed cautiously and with transparency if they use generative AI for content moderation.

Tracking social media platforms' and AI companies' public commitments to combat deceptive uses of AI in the 2024 elections.

Former senior DOJ official Mary McCord writes about "the necessity for government officials to be able to communicate freely with social media companies about the abuses of their…

Murthy v Missouri may become a landmark case in which the justices are led astray on the basis of a disinformation-laden record.

Both the private sector and government will have to work more seriously to help safeguard American democracy from falsehoods.

A collaboration between social scientists and Meta has been held up as a potential “new model for platform research” that may help explain the effects social media companies…

The interactions at the heart of Missouri v. Biden implicate many speech interests: those of the platforms, independent entities researching misinformation, the government, and…

To unpack the initial decision in Missouri v. Biden, and what it means for the First Amendment, we have Knight Institute Fellow Mayze Teitler.

Invoking the First Amendment, a single district court judge effectively issued a prior restraint on large swaths of speech, cutting short an essential dialogue between the government…

The Oversight Board’s recommendation that Meta create a protocol to preserve and share graphic conflict-related content signals that we may be teetering on the edge of a powerful…

The current debate's failure to engage a complex reality serves neither the interests of national security nor freedom of expression.