Administrative Law

The most comprehensive study of court cases involving the Trump administration from January 20, 2025 to present

A public resource tracking all the legal challenges to the Trump administration's executive orders and actions.

The next administration should lean into enforcement as a strategy to advance fairness, justice, and the rule of law.

Cautionary tales show well-intentioned procedural requirements can tie up decisionmaking without meaningfully enhancing outcomes.

Gubernatorial opposition is a powerful and often necessary component of meaningful state pushback against federal overreach.

The erosion of the presumption of regularity presents opportunities to those challenging the Trump administration’s agenda in court.

Trump v. Cook marked a significant break from the traditional judicial deference known as the "presumption of regularity."

Numerous federal agencies possess statutory authority to obtain a wide range of sensitive information without advance judicial approval or probable cause of illegal activity.

All highly capable AI models should be regulated through pre-deployment and ongoing testing. But any safety regime that works for domestic models should work for Chinese ones.

New data shows how mass firings, loyalist replacements, and pressure tactics are turning U.S. immigration courts into a deportation enforcement arm.

In these two cases, the Court misread history with an unmistakable result: two fundamentally irreconcilable decisions.

On the Supreme Court’s latest reasoning about the Federal Reserve and the fault lines that are likely to emerge in the years ahead.