Administrative Law

A public resource tracking all the legal challenges to the Trump administration's executive orders and actions.

Gubernatorial opposition is a powerful and often necessary component of meaningful state pushback against federal overreach.

The erosion of the presumption of regularity presents opportunities to those challenging the Trump administration’s agenda in court.

Trump v. Cook marked a significant break from the traditional judicial deference known as the "presumption of regularity."

Numerous federal agencies possess statutory authority to obtain a wide range of sensitive information without advance judicial approval or probable cause of illegal activity.

All highly capable AI models should be regulated through pre-deployment and ongoing testing. But any safety regime that works for domestic models should work for Chinese ones.

New data shows how mass firings, loyalist replacements, and pressure tactics are turning U.S. immigration courts into a deportation enforcement arm.

In these two cases, the Court misread history with an unmistakable result: two fundamentally irreconcilable decisions.

On the Supreme Court’s latest reasoning about the Federal Reserve and the fault lines that are likely to emerge in the years ahead.

On the forgotten history of the Supreme Court's Humphrey’s Executor v. United States, a cornerstone of the administrative state.

How the Administrative Procedure Act and state unfair competition laws could be used to punish, deter, or expose corruption in the federal government.

The Trump administration's executive order on mail-in voting is unconstitutional. States and Congress—not the President—have authority to regulate federal elections.