Accountability

The U.S. government has a special responsibility to not impose avoidable harm to those who will carry out Nidal Hasan's execution.

Erwin Chemerinsky and Aziz Huq discuss the powers that state and local governments can use to serve as a check against authoritarianism and federal overreach.

When academics, business and law firm heads, and leaders of international associations like the ABILA defend the rule of law, those ripples can build into a wave of change.

Recent developments signal a European commitment to upholding global anti-corruption norms even without U.S. involvement.

This series aims to set out what a meaningful, multistakeholder, and globally relevant AI accountability mechanism should look like.

Despite their flaws, Syrian institutions have the potential to become vehicles of accountability with sustained international engagement.

If federal agencies fail to create records related to their AI interactions, they effectively insulate their decisionmaking from oversight.

A series exploring the powers and authorities state and local governments have to check federal overreach and protect democratic norms and individual rights.

A House Foreign Affairs Committee report sheds light on the Trump administration's contentious interventions into Bosnia's politics.

The United States is deporting third-country nationals to Equatorial Guinea despite its documented pattern of human rights abuses.

The global war on terror demands reflection and reckoning for the damage it caused to human rights and the international legal order.

The law of armed conflict is not suited to provide the legal clarity the public desires immediately following attacks that kill civilians.