Cyber

Neither banning Chinese advanced AI models nor ignoring their risks to national security will serve American interests.

Congress should build a durable private-public standing forum in the next National Defense Authorization Act.

This syllabus supplement offers curated articles intended to be combined with traditional casebooks in a law or higher ed classroom.

International law must adapt to AI-enabled ransomware threats to ensure accountability for the cumulative injury inflicted by their campaigns.

A proposed bill would help ensure that antitrust law does not deter legitimate collaboration on mitigating AI security risks.

Recent U.N. discussions add a new forum on global governance and international norms on military uses of A.I.

Members of the Senate are taking steps to regulate and restrict how the Department of Defense develops and uses AI in its operations.

The U.S. needs to lead a new export control regime -- coordinating with its partners and allies -- to constrain China’s ability to produce advanced and foundational chips.

With risk-based personnel vetting practices, U.S. AI labs can keep recruiting the world’s best researchers while safeguarding national security.

The U.S. shift away from a rules-based export regime amid a race for AI leadership is causing India to hedge against a heavy reliance on American technology.

Software ecosystems are strategic infrastructure, yet they remain almost invisible within national security risk assessments.

The administration must treat the program as economic statecraft rather than a vehicle for green-lighting deals industry would pursue anyway.