Trump administration second term

Congress should establish a bipartisan commission to investigate errors in going to war with Iran and how the war has been waged.

Trump v. Cook marked a significant break from the traditional judicial deference known as the "presumption of regularity."

As a federal-level accountability desert forms, states are reviving "collateral accountability" — damages suits against federal officers who violate constitutional rights.

For the United States to take the lead in AI cyber operations capabilities, government and industry must create appropriate safeguards.

States parties should use the United States’ bid for support in its fight against the ICC to push back on Washington’s attempt to dismantle the Court.

States must be vigilant stewards of their data — auditing what they hold, limiting what they share, and enforcing legal constraints against federal overreach.

A timeline that chronicles major events in the Trump administration’s campaign of lethal strikes against suspected drug traffickers in the Caribbean and Eastern Pacific.

Iceland may seek European integration partly as a hedge against a more capricious and unpredictable United States, and others may follow.

On the role of U.S. military leaders in addressing legal constraints and strategic questions.

States have constitutional protections against commandeering and coercion — but face a new challenge when the federal government sidelines states completely.

The U.S. sanctions against International Criminal Court judges and officials are a threat to constitutional rights in the United States.

State and local governments have constitutional and legal powers that can be harnessed to challenge repressive federal actions and to advance meaningful freedom and equality.