Trump administration second term

Over 175 years later, cities’ historic role as hubs of resistance takes on renewed resonance in today’s era of rising authoritarianism in the United States.

A public resource tracking all the legal challenges to the Trump administration's executive orders and actions.

A series exploring the powers and authorities state and local governments have to check federal overreach and protect democratic norms and individual rights.

Host Ryan Goodman is joined by an expert panel to discuss whether the United States has violated the law of armed conflict in its war against Iran.

States need independent agencies with jurisdiction to enforce their residents’ rights so the valuation of those rights are evenhanded and not subject to political will.

U.S. strikes against suspected drug-trafficking vessels mark an unlawful expansion of military force into what has long been—and should remain—a law enforcement mission.

Collection of expert analysis on the legality of the U.S. strike on Venezuelan vessels in the Caribbean, the consequences of the strike, and related issues.

The erosion of the presumption of regularity presents opportunities to those challenging the Trump administration’s agenda in court.

Congress should establish a bipartisan commission to investigate errors in going to war with Iran and how the war has been waged.

Trump v. Cook marked a significant break from the traditional judicial deference known as the "presumption of regularity."

As a federal-level accountability desert forms, states are reviving "collateral accountability" — damages suits against federal officers who violate constitutional rights.

For the United States to take the lead in AI cyber operations capabilities, government and industry must create appropriate safeguards.