Regulation

Members of the Senate are taking steps to regulate and restrict how the Department of Defense develops and uses AI in its operations.

With risk-based personnel vetting practices, U.S. AI labs can keep recruiting the world’s best researchers while safeguarding national security.

The U.S. shift away from a rules-based export regime amid a race for AI leadership is causing India to hedge against a heavy reliance on American technology.

Providers, not regulators, are increasingly setting the standards against which their own AI systems are measured.

"The breadth of the order issued with respect to the Anthropic models is unprecedented."

"Further evidence of the need for a regulatory system that provides a more stable equilibrium for stakeholders to operate."

The administration must treat the program as economic statecraft rather than a vehicle for green-lighting deals industry would pursue anyway.

Trump's new AI executive order creates the scaffolding for a workable regulatory regime, especially for cybersecurity risks, but failed to make it mandatory.

Just Security's collection of 100+ articles analyzing the implications of AI for society, democracy, human rights, and warfare.

The Trump administration's executive order on mail-in voting is unconstitutional. States and Congress—not the President—have authority to regulate federal elections.

The FATF Mutual Evaluation of the United States serves as an opportunity to promote the preservation of multilateral norms and standards.

In a functioning democracy, citizens don’t fear who is in power because rules, not rulers, hold sway. The same principle should govern the future of AI.