executive branch

Joshua Geltzer, Jenny Marron, and Sam Winter-Levy join Brianna Rosen on the Just Security podcast to discuss the Trump administration's AI Action Plan.

Congress has revealed itself less as a coequal branch and more as an accomplice in the marginalization of its own constitutional role in foreign and national security policy.

Highlights of podcast discussion by experts on DHS, DOJ and Congress.

From export controls to the U.S. workforce, the plan’s decisions will have major consequences for the country’s AI development & deployment.

Costs for scientific progress and the public could be profound if the Trump administration succeeds in significantly cutting research funding.

CASA’s reasoning left open multiple avenues for litigants seeking to obtain broad relief against unlawful executive actions

Trump’s strike on Iran violated constitutional limits on the president's unilateral power to take the nation to war—an authority the Framers reserved for Congress.

After Trump v. CASA, the APA offers a path to nationwide relief against unconstitutional executive actions—without relying on universal injunctions.

Even amid domestic retrenchment of business regulation and oversight, corporations must adhere to internationally recognized human rights responsibilities.

The Trump administration's efforts to circumvent the APA's notice-and-comment requirements risk setting a damaging precedent.

Consolidating cases allows a clear, expedited path to Supreme Court review, helping quickly address matters involving executive orders.

It is essential to understand the line between war and peace, scrutinize the application of wartime powers, and interrogate the president’s assertions when he triggers them.