courts

A new ICC policy provides a valuable framework for the investigation of cyber-enabled international crimes.

A deep dive into the Trump administration’s first-year deregulatory agenda, Supreme Court influences, and the evolving limits of agency authority.

The relationship between international courts and States shapes how they provide accountability, build peace, and respond to backlash.

In Burnley v. United States, relatives sue on behalf of two Trinidadian men killed in a boat strike, confronting U.S. sovereign immunity and the political question doctrine.

International courts rarely end wars, but when designed humbly, creatively, and fairly, they can help parties choose law over war—turning justice into a path toward peace.

An expert guide to analyzing criminal exposure arising from the use—or misuse—of generative artificial intelligence.

Foreign aid cuts have halted most international judicial training. What future paths remain for U.S. judges seeking global engagement?

This article examines how the ICJ and ICC navigate legitimacy challenges in armed conflicts, testing their authority, fairness, and impact on global peace and justice.

Judicial involvement in ongoing armed conflicts should be examined from multiple vantage points: courts, victims, parties to conflict, and broader goals of peace and security.

As the ICJ hears Gambia v. Myanmar, the Court should continue to consider “patterns of conduct,” while weighing this evidence with other sources for genocidal intent.

Americans are witnessing a concerted effort to delegitimize legal defense for marginalized or politically disfavored people.

Trump’s attempt to fire FTC Commissioner Rebecca Slaughter without cause forces the Court to revisit Humphrey’s Executor and the future of independent agencies.