Artificial Intelligence (AI)

Ensuring algorithms recognize protected emblems is an achievable first step to protect civilians and prevent future AI-enabled tragedies.

The U.S. government should respond to Chinese AI adversarial distillation attacks with a layered set of established legal authorities.

Experts share questions Congress, journalists, and the public should ask executive branch officials on surveillance authorities.

In a functioning democracy, citizens don’t fear who is in power because rules, not rulers, hold sway. The same principle should govern the future of AI.

The 9th U.N. Global Counter-Terrorism Strategy should insist that AI-enabled counterterrorism policies and practices demonstrably comply with international law.

The White House's National AI Policy Framework asks Congress to shut down the only governments that are regulating AI, in exchange for a federal regime that would not.

The Iran War and the public rupture between DoD and Anthropic point to a fundamental imbalance in current military AI.

The real test will be whether clearer policy guidance, legal authorities, and institutional structures follow the Trump administration's Cyber Strategy for America.

Stakeholders have a narrowing window to shape what comes next with highly autonomous cyber-capable AI agents—before capabilities increase further and incentives harden.

Do data centers qualify as lawful military objectives? If so, under what circumstances are they subject to attack? And what precautions must be taken before targeting them?

Like plastic, AI is permeating every corner of life. But there is still time to manage AI better than we did with synthetics.

As the Grok case demonstrated, AI harms will continue to unfold without trusted channels between governments, industry and civil society.