Anthropic

As the risks of artificial intelligence continue to mount, the expert analysis in this series engages the fundamental question of what ought to happen when AI risks manifest into…

The argument that pacing U.S. AI development will allow China to "win the AI race" misreads Beijing's capabilities.

State governments have the authority to allow AI companies to coordinate on safety measures without running afoul of federal antitrust laws.

This series aims to set out what a meaningful, multistakeholder, and globally relevant AI accountability mechanism should look like.

Advanced AI systems have crossed an important threshold from commercial software to technologies viewed as strategic national assets.

A series of Supreme Court rulings have left the federal government with a narrow path to regulating open-weight AI models.

Tech company leaders' warnings about the dangers of AI demand urgent international legal efforts to regulate artificial intelligence.

If tech leaders are serious about oversight to curtail AI risk, they will need to endow evaluators with independence, information, money, and clout to enforce decisions.

For the United States to take the lead in AI cyber operations capabilities, government and industry must create appropriate safeguards.

Anthropic v. Department of War reveals why courts must distinguish genuine national security judgments from pretextual ones and how to do it.

All highly capable AI models should be regulated through pre-deployment and ongoing testing. But any safety regime that works for domestic models should work for Chinese ones.

The Pentagon's push to integrate AI into weapons systems exposes a critical gap: no one can agree on what "autonomous weapons" means.