Rule of Law

States must be vigilant stewards of their data — auditing what they hold, limiting what they share, and enforcing legal constraints against federal overreach.

On the role of U.S. military leaders in addressing legal constraints and strategic questions.

Lessons from Nixon's forgotten essay in defense of his infamous remark.

States have constitutional protections against commandeering and coercion — but face a new challenge when the federal government sidelines states completely.

The U.S. sanctions against International Criminal Court judges and officials are a threat to constitutional rights in the United States.

State and local governments have constitutional and legal powers that can be harnessed to challenge repressive federal actions and to advance meaningful freedom and equality.

The ICC's ability to function will depend significantly on Japan's response to the U.S. sanctions against the Court's Japanese president.

To maintain sanctions' effectiveness as a tool, governments should strive to implement them with clarity, consistency, and credibility.

Social media disclosure requirements implicate fundamental First Amendment rights, and the public has a right to know why they were implemented.

After the vote to remove Karim Khan, it is urgent that the ICC appoint a new Chief Prosecutor whose ethical compass is beyond reproach.

Neither banning Chinese advanced AI models nor ignoring their risks to national security will serve American interests.

State attorneys general and local district attorneys can take action to uphold the rule of law in the face of unlawful federal actions.