Digital Surveillance

Part II of a series discussing the digital-privacy paradox emerging from a Fourth Amendment revolution in Carpenter v. United States.

The third-party paradox has massive implications for privacy rights and raises important questions about how to challenge the government’s request for information that might…

Part I of a series discussing the digital-privacy paradox emerging from a Fourth Amendment revolution in Carpenter v. United States.

In hosting the G20 summit, Prime Minister Modi is touting a sustainable digital future. But privacy and data protection fall to the wayside.

We urgently need a system where the developers of spyware tools are forced either to require their State customers to provide credible guarantees on future human rights compliance,…

A key UN committee opened its doors to civil society and experts, but the resulting Delhi Declaration contains little of that input thus far.

The intended crime-fighting proposals could force encrypted-messaging services to abandon basic confidentiality or pull out of the market.

Hype and untested promises have accelerated deployment of artificial intelligence, biometrics, and more, in the dubious name of security.

The new secretary-general of the standard-setting body will have global impact on whether the digital sphere will be beneficial for all.

If Roe is overturned, states will likely use sweeping digital surveillance tools to enforce abortion bans.

CTED's "best practices" on biometrics miss a key dimension: international human rights law guidance.

Despite its “going dark” claims, the FBI can obtain a remarkable amount of user data from secure messaging apps that collectively have several billion global users.