Artificial Intelligence (AI)

The White House's National AI Policy Framework asks Congress to shut down the only governments that are regulating AI, in exchange for a federal regime that would not.

The Iran War and the public rupture between DoD and Anthropic point to a fundamental imbalance in current military AI.

The case of Meta's platforms in India reminds us that in digital governance, rights are not only written into policy, but must be written into design.

Stakeholders have a narrowing window to shape what comes next with highly autonomous cyber-capable AI agents—before capabilities increase further and incentives harden.

Like plastic, AI is permeating every corner of life. But there is still time to manage AI better than we did with synthetics.

As the Grok case demonstrated, AI harms will continue to unfold without trusted channels between governments, industry and civil society.

The 2026 REAIM Summit demonstrated the ongoing misalignment between global initiatives, industry narratives around AI capabilities, and the realities of military AI use.

The Trump administration’s salvo against Anthropic is invalidated by statutory limits, First Amendment freedoms, and the Constitution’s absolute bar against bills of attainder

Policymakers and the private sector should work with civil society to ensure that the pursuit of “sovereign AI” does not undermine fundamental rights.

Abuse of a tailored national security authority to resolve an ideological dispute playing out over DoD’s desire to change its contractual terms should not be taken lightly. 

AI companies should resist the urge to undercut Anthropic and use their collective leverage to make clear that access to frontier models comes with limits.

To lead in biotechnology, the United States must modernize its data infrastructure and create biodata built for the AI future.