Litigation

For the Rome Statute to remain relevant, practitioners must understand how governments can deploy spyware to commit international crimes.

Tracking the use of State power requires systematically identifying linkages between individual developments and broader trends. This graphic offers one method.

Analysis of birthright citizenship statutory arguments now before the Supreme Court.

With unparalleled funding for ICE, corporations supporting the growth of detention infrastructure will continue to see soaring profits.

The administration has turned consent decrees into a deregulatory weapon, and courts are beginning to confront the limits of that strategy.

The concerns expressed about the possible application of UCMJ's Article 88 to the protected speech of retired military officers aren't theoretical.

Congress can take steps now to revise IEEPA & strengthen accountability & oversight when the executive branch leverages U.S. economic powers.

A comprehensive study of court cases involving the Trump administration from January 20, 2025 to present

Unpacking the Justice Department's arguments in the birthright citizenship litigation.

To introduce accountability for cyberattacks, Congress should make it clear that U.S. courts are the right venue for spyware cases.

For litigants seeking to move quickly against unlawful executive action, Section 705 of the Administrative Procedure Act should be a powerful tool.

The recent decision in SpaceX v. NLRB, finding the Board’s structure unconstitutional, heightens the urgency for those litigating like cases to reconsider their approach.