Litigation

The U.S. sanctions against International Criminal Court judges and officials are a threat to constitutional rights in the United States.

Tracking the use of State power requires systematically identifying linkages between individual developments and broader trends. This interactive graphic offers one method.

State attorneys general and local district attorneys can take action to uphold the rule of law in the face of unlawful federal actions.

Together, the Trump administration’s vision of the Clean Air Act’s exemption authority and shutting courts out from review is one of completely unchecked presidential power.

After suspending donations to SPLC, major charitable giving platforms must question whether it is prudent to defer to a DOJ that courts no longer trust.

A detailed record of federal courts and grand juries rejecting the Trump administration’s use of subpoenas, search warrants, and indictments.

In these two cases, the Court misread history with an unmistakable result: two fundamentally irreconcilable decisions.

On the Supreme Court’s latest reasoning about the Federal Reserve and the fault lines that are likely to emerge in the years ahead.

Chatrie stands as an important but narrow reaffirmation of the Supreme Court’s determination not to let technology overwhelm all privacy expectations in the digital age.

Leading immigration expert unpacks the Supreme Court's ruling on temporary protected status for Haitian and Syrian residents in U.S.

Unpacking the Supreme Court opinion in Cisco Systems, Inc. v. Doe.

Many actions taken by the current administration echo the grievances laid out in the Declaration of Independence against King George III.