Litigation

After Trump v. CASA, the APA offers a path to nationwide relief against unconstitutional executive actions—without relying on universal injunctions.

Tracking the use of State power requires systematically identifying linkages between individual developments and broader trends. This graphic offers one method.

Ideology affects U.S. terrorism prosecutions: ISIS-linked defendants tend to get longer sentences than those tied to other extremist groups or ideologies.

While Mexico’s claims were set aside, the Court laid out new pathways to accountability, providing a clearer roadmap of which legal strategies are likelier to succeed.

Consolidating cases allows a clear, expedited path to Supreme Court review, helping quickly address matters involving executive orders.

A recent U.S. Court of International Trade ruling may distract more than it changes the course of U.S. President Trump's trade policy.

A recent court decision has made clear that reorganizing the federal government can't proceed through backdoor executive planning.

A "case cruncher" on the legal doctrine governing the state secrets privilege, and a Table containing senior government officials' public acknowledgments.

On the reconciliation bill’s provision that would restrict federal courts’ authority to hold government officials in contempt for violating court orders

Federal courts possess a number of tools to ensure the U.S. government is held responsible for failing to enforce or execute court orders.

An emerging consensus among federal judges on the AEA's application increases the odds for the Trump administration's loss at the Supreme Court.

A discussion with Rebecca Hamilton about the use of State power and how to identify linkages between individual developments and broader trends in press freedom and beyond.