TikTok

The safeguards emerging from Taiwan's effort to address information manipulation risks offer democracies a platform governance roadmap.

Congress must ban demands for payment to the government for national-security related approvals and prohibit companies from making these payments.

By abandoning proactive content moderation, platforms are accelerating a global slide toward censorship — the very outcome they claim to oppose.

Researchers analyzing misinformation deserve to be defended — and the campaign to end their work threatens the right to free speech.

Trump's recent executive actions appear to assert an authority to override or ignore federal legislation whenever it interferes with his policy aims.

"I remain convinced that the statute authorizing the ban is an ill-advised and unconstitutional law that does lasting damage to the First Amendment rights of millions of Americans…

Marty Lederman, Asha Rangappa, and Xiangnong (George) Wang discuss how the Supreme Court balanced free speech rights and national security concerns in the TikTok case.

"If the Court were to accept the Solicitor General’s rationale ... the government would be free to force the removal of owners of any media outlet whose fealty it did not trust."

The TikTok ban is a reincarnation of past reactionary efforts to limit Americans from accessing media from abroad.

The Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia (ECCC), tasked with addressing the atrocities of the Khmer Rouge regime, has ventured into uncharted territory: TikTok.

Early efforts to enforce the Digital Services Act shed light on what is at least theoretically possible in the U.S.

Both the private sector and government will have to work more seriously to help safeguard American democracy from falsehoods.