Technology

State lawmakers and regulators should work to prohibit companionship chatbots that interact with minors as bullies.

As the risks of artificial intelligence continue to mount, the expert analysis in this series engages the fundamental question of what ought to happen when AI risks manifest into…

The argument that pacing U.S. AI development will allow China to "win the AI race" misreads Beijing's capabilities.

State governments have the authority to allow AI companies to coordinate on safety measures without running afoul of federal antitrust laws.

Tech company leaders' warnings about the dangers of AI demand urgent international legal efforts to regulate artificial intelligence.

If tech leaders are serious about oversight to curtail AI risk, they will need to endow evaluators with independence, information, money, and clout to enforce decisions.

As the U.S. and China compete on AI, concepts such as export controls can no longer determine who leads in that or across a range of other emerging technology.

This syllabus supplement offers curated articles intended to be combined with traditional casebooks in a law or higher ed classroom.

China's new rules limiting the use of A.I. companion systems reveal a gap in how the United States regulates A.I. chatbots.

Other middle powers should emulate Canada’s focus on the rule of law as a central principle of A.I. governance.

The U.S. needs to lead a new export control regime -- coordinating with its partners and allies -- to constrain China’s ability to produce advanced and foundational chips.

With risk-based personnel vetting practices, U.S. AI labs can keep recruiting the world’s best researchers while safeguarding national security.