Technology

Tech company leaders' warnings about the dangers of AI demand urgent international legal efforts to regulate artificial intelligence.

If tech leaders are serious about oversight to curtail AI risk, they will need to endow evaluators with independence, information, money, and clout to enforce decisions.

As the U.S. and China compete on AI, concepts such as export controls can no longer determine who leads in that or across a range of other emerging technology.

This syllabus supplement offers curated articles intended to be combined with traditional casebooks in a law or higher ed classroom.

China's new rules limiting the use of A.I. companion systems reveal a gap in how the United States regulates A.I. chatbots.

Other middle powers should emulate Canada’s focus on the rule of law as a central principle of A.I. governance.

The U.S. needs to lead a new export control regime -- coordinating with its partners and allies -- to constrain China’s ability to produce advanced and foundational chips.

With risk-based personnel vetting practices, U.S. AI labs can keep recruiting the world’s best researchers while safeguarding national security.

The U.S. shift away from a rules-based export regime amid a race for AI leadership is causing India to hedge against a heavy reliance on American technology.

As surely as day follows night, survivors will continue their quest for justice and accountability. The Supreme Court’s decision marks the end of an era, but a new dawn awaits.

The Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women is quietly becoming a normative force in the governance of digital economies.

Zambia’s cancellation of RightsCon is an indication not only of China’s influence, but also the country's own democratic erosion under a government that promised otherwise.