Nuclear Weapons

Experts analyze critical dimensions of Israel’s strikes relevant responses, covering nuclear diplomacy; strategic, security, and regional implications; and international law.

The White House's future BDA briefings on the Iran strikes will likely project certainty where analysis still urges caution.

The White House’s legal justifications for attacking Iran are unconvincing and raise concerns about unauthorized use of force. Congress should push back.

The constellation of forces in Israel, the United States, and beyond complicates efforts to find an off-ramp to the war.

Strategic implications of Israel’s strikes on Iran and key questions policymakers should ask to navigate what comes next.

The Israel-Iran crisis will be a key test for how the Trump administration handles national security crises and its ability to respond.

An assessment of the implications of Israel's strikes on Iran this morning for nuclear diplomacy and regional stability.

The Trump administration should focus on messaging pragmatic objectives for a deal and de-emphasizing U.S. efforts to exert “maximum pressure” on Iran while talks are ongoing.

Stepping away from NATO would reduce U.S. leverage over European allies, potentially leading to more nuclear-armed states.

The United States will uphold its leadership in non-proliferation by refraining from unnecessary and destabilizing nuclear tests.

We asked leading experts what questions the Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources should focus on in Wright’s confirmation hearing.

Trump faces a significant challenge in addressing Iran's nuclear program, but he also has an opportunity to reduce its proliferation risks.