Military

States committed to the rule of law can use the International Criminal Court to maximize the cost of adversaries' military aggression.

Host Ryan Goodman is joined by an expert panel to discuss whether the United States has violated the law of armed conflict in its war against Iran.

Collection of expert analysis on the legality of the U.S. strike on Venezuelan vessels in the Caribbean, the consequences of the strike, and related issues.

Tess Bridgeman and Rachel Goldbrenner are joined by Brian Finucane and Rebecca Ingber to discuss the latest U.S. strikes against suspected drug traffickers.

A timeline that chronicles major events in the Trump administration’s campaign of lethal strikes against suspected drug traffickers in the Caribbean and Eastern Pacific.

On the role of U.S. military leaders in addressing legal constraints and strategic questions.

This syllabus supplement offers curated articles intended to be combined with traditional casebooks in a law or higher ed classroom.

Anthropic v. Department of War reveals why courts must distinguish genuine national security judgments from pretextual ones and how to do it.

Operation Epic Fury demonstrates that airpower is both essential and insufficient. A review of what the campaign reveals about airpower's promises, limits and lessons in Iran.

Ukraine's survival in the face of Russia's aggression demonstrates how U.S. support to civil society and democratic institutions becomes a national security asset.

Recent U.N. discussions add a new forum on global governance and international norms on military uses of A.I.

The Mendez Principles, drafted to end the use of torture in interrogations, are being implemented variously across regions and institutions.