Law of Armed Conflict (LOAC)

Top law-of-war experts give us their views on a statement made by a senior US official concerning humanitarian relief in Gaza and hostages.

A response to an article published on how military campaigns can never be rendered disproportionate by the total harm inflicted on civilians.

Whether the magnitude of State responses to terror is ethical and wise goes beyond determinations of legal compliance.

The "AI for Democracy" argument rests on misguided - and potentially dangerous - assumptions.

A guide to the humanitarian law conditions on U.S. arms sales and security assistance to Israel.

The right of self-defense does not permit a disproportionate loss of civilian life, writes Professor Adil Haque in this essay on what U.N. Member States can say.

"Conversations of this nature are useless if their participants fail to acknowledge their differences of opinion about underlying assumptions."

International law is critical to survival in Israel and Palestine.

Notions of what constitutes signaling and intent must evolve with AI if states are to avoid potentially catastrophic consequences.

Resolving AI challenges requires global cooperation - or waiting for a crisis that brings the need for multilateralism into sharper focus.

Experts detail how the laws of war apply to Israel-Hamas conflict to assist policymakers and the public at large.

ICRC statement says "instructions issued by the Israeli authorities for the population of Gaza City to immediately leave their homes, coupled with the complete siege explicitly…