courts

Invoking the First Amendment, a single district court judge effectively issued a prior restraint on large swaths of speech, cutting short an essential dialogue between the government…

The United States should make good on its commitment to follow through on the Special Rapporteur's Guantanamo report.

The charging of Cop City protestors as domestic terrorists highlights the dangerous manner in which the federal government’s DVE policies are playing out on the ground – interacting…

Homeland security organizations are injecting federal spy agencies into local political matters, often without meaningful restrictions.

The new realignment of the DHS Office of Intelligence & Analysis fails to address the agency's fundamental problems.

The current debate's failure to engage a complex reality serves neither the interests of national security nor freedom of expression.

To help us understand judicial ethics and what can be done to keep the Justices accountable, we have Caroline Fredrickson and Alan Neff.

A jury finding Fox News liable for defamation would be both a fair outcome and a victory for democracy and the First Amendment.

Linkages in the Israeli debates of an independent judiciary to the protection of democracy suggests a cautionary note for the United States.

Determined victims and creative lawyers used a U.S, law, the Torture Victims Protection Act, to hold a powerful mayor accountable.

For the Court’s reputation and rule of law values, the Justices should put their own house in order, rather than have it done for them.

Instead of demonstrating eagerness to reconsider Section 230, the Justices appeared unsure about how exactly the law should be interpreted.