Other

× Clear Filters
1,805 Articles
Just Security

Recap of Recent Pieces on Just Security (June 2-9)

I. Featured Essay (on President Trump, the Intelligence Community, and Democratic Institutions) Jeffrey H. Smith, Of Laws, Not Men (Friday, June 9) II. Trump Campaign and Russia…

Of Laws, Not Men

Those old enough to remember Watergate will recall that “we are a government of laws, not men” became a mantra. It was repeated so often as to risk banality. But we are a nation…

The Silly “Comey-the-Criminal” Meme–a.k.a. Why Claims that Comey’s a “Leaker” Ring Hollow

The strangest claim to emerge from yesterday’s Senate intelligence committee hearing is the one first suggested by President Trump’s personal lawyer, Marc Kasowitz,…

Ask a Law Professor: Was it Obstruction?

With former FBI director James Comey’s hearing today, we heard it straight from the horse’s mouth that Comey interpreted President Trump’s “hope”…
Just Security

National Security-Related Congressional Hearings, June 5-9

Tuesday, June 6 9:30am – Senate Armed Services Committee – Posture of the Department of the Air Force (here) 10:00am – Senate Homeland Security Committee –  The…
June 2017 calendar with the date Wednesday the 14th boxed in red.

More on the Effective Date of the Entry Ban and the Hawaii Injunction (Response to Will Baude)

In a post yesterday, I argued that it wouldn’t make much sense for the Supreme Court to grant the government’s petition for certiorari in the “entry ban”…
Just Security

Recap of Recent Posts on Just Security (May 29-June 2)

I. Trump and Russia Bob Bauer, Campaign Finance Law: When “Collusion” with a Foreign Government Becomes a Crime (Friday, June 2) Andy Wright and Kate Brannen, Could the White…
Just Security

A simple reason to deny cert. in Trump v. IRAP: because the entry ban expires in 12 days, anyway

Cross-posted at Take Care. Last night, the Acting Solicitor General filed a petition for certiorari in Trump v. International Refugee Assistance Project, the Maryland case…
U.S. Naval Commander Charles Swift who represents Salim Ahmed Hamdan, a Guantanamo Bay detainee, speaks on his mobile phone after the Supreme Court ruled against the proposed military tribunals June 29, 2006 in Washington, DC. The Supreme Court ruled that the military tribunals created by the Bush administration to try terror suspects violate both American military law and the Geneva Convention.

Why the Supreme Court Should Take the Two New Guantánamo Military Commission Appeals

In a footnote to his concurring opinion in the en banc D.C. Circuit’s October 2016 ruling in al Bahlul v. United States, D.C. Circuit Judge Brett Kavanaugh stressed the…
A mural on a fence reads, “Heal Syria” and shows butterflies painted with the Syrian flag. Some of the butterflies are colored on one half in the Syrian flag and on the other half with other country flags.

New Atrocities Prevention & Response Legislation Introduced

I posted earlier about a new bipartisan bill to advance accountability in Syria: the Syrian War Crimes Accountability Act of 2017 (current status is here). Two additional pieces…

Delegating Commander-in-Chief Powers–Where to strike the balance

The Trump Administration is busy reconsidering the United States’ approach to counterterrorism, and its revised policies will assuredly reflect President Trump’s desire to…
Just Security

Memorial Day

In honor of Memorial Day, Just Security will be on an abbreviated schedule with a lower volume of posts than normal. If any major, time-sensitive developments occur, we will do…
1-12 of 1,805 items

DON'T MISS A THING. Stay up to date with Just Security curated newsletters: