Supreme Court (SCOTUS)

For litigants seeking to move quickly against unlawful executive action, Section 705 of the Administrative Procedure Act should be a powerful tool.

The recent decision in SpaceX v. NLRB, finding the Board’s structure unconstitutional, heightens the urgency for those litigating like cases to reconsider their approach.

Analysis of the aftermath of Trump v CASA and the pending litigation about the Trump executive order on birthright citizenship.

Analysis of the aftermath of Trump v CASA and the pending litigation about the Trump executive order on birthright citizenship.

"One of the most consequential Supreme Court decisions arose from the courageous resolve of the Dartmouth College trustees to resist the unlawful encroachments..."

CASA’s reasoning left open multiple avenues for litigants seeking to obtain broad relief against unlawful executive actions

After Trump v. CASA, the APA offers a path to nationwide relief against unconstitutional executive actions—without relying on universal injunctions.

Mexico's claims were denied on jurisdiction, but the Supreme Court provided a roadmap to other scenarios in which such claims might advance.

While Mexico’s claims were set aside, the Court laid out new pathways to accountability, providing a clearer roadmap of which legal strategies are likelier to succeed.

Consolidating cases allows a clear, expedited path to Supreme Court review, helping quickly address matters involving executive orders.

Chiraag Bains, in conversation with Dani Schulkin, discusses the impact on voting rights enforcement and the crucial role now played by voters & advocacy groups.

"Without question, Congress understood that the birthright citizenship statute extended to the two groups that President Trump has targeted"