Privacy

Social media disclosure requirements implicate fundamental First Amendment rights, and the public has a right to know why they were implemented.

Numerous federal agencies possess statutory authority to obtain a wide range of sensitive information without advance judicial approval or probable cause of illegal activity.

Chatrie stands as an important but narrow reaffirmation of the Supreme Court’s determination not to let technology overwhelm all privacy expectations in the digital age.

Section 702 surveillance and parallel construction may be quietly driving aggressive ICE workplace raids, hiding constitutional violations from workers and businesses.

The Trump administration's executive order on mail-in voting is unconstitutional. States and Congress—not the President—have authority to regulate federal elections.

Experts share questions Congress, journalists, and the public should ask executive branch officials on surveillance authorities.

For the Rome Statute to remain relevant, practitioners must understand how governments can deploy spyware to commit international crimes.

Inaction on PADFA means that the personal information of U.S. citizens can continue to be transferred to adversarial nations without consequences.

A new series on what is at stake — and what can be done — to ensure government information remains publicly accessible and properly stored.

Government employees must take steps to guard against internal workplace surveillance in the current political climate.

"The risks to U.S. persons, as well as non-U.S. persons, from the misuse, abuse, and exfiltration of data are quite substantial."

Now is the time to prepare for the second quantum revolution.