Israel

"Another legal framework – the ongoing armed conflict framework – is more factually and legally viable than the anticipatory or preventive self-defense frameworks."

Experts analyze critical dimensions of Israel’s strikes relevant responses, covering nuclear diplomacy; strategic, security, and regional implications; and international law.

Strategic implications of Israel’s strikes on Iran and key questions policymakers should ask to navigate what comes next.

The Israel-Iran crisis will be a key test for how the Trump administration handles national security crises and its ability to respond.

An assessment of the implications of Israel's strikes on Iran this morning for nuclear diplomacy and regional stability.

Germany’s recent disclosure of military support to Israel raises serious questions about what Germany told the International Court of Justice last year.

Analysis of jus ad bellum with Israel’s stated objectives for its current military operations in Gaza.

A well-resourced CHIRG could help prevent U.S. arms from being used unlawfully, and offer a credible response to critics of America’s global weapons transfers.

The Trump administration should focus on messaging pragmatic objectives for a deal and de-emphasizing U.S. efforts to exert “maximum pressure” on Iran while talks are ongoing.

A recent decision from Israel's Supreme Court exposes some of the underlying tensions and inadequacies within international humanitarian law in countering conflict-induced civilian…

As combatants sit in the trenches – scrolling, posting, taking selfies – they can be targeted with online ads that espouse the laws of war.

The International Criminal Court (ICC)’s caselaw on immunity is entirely consistent with international law.