executive branch

Unpacking the Trump administration's AI Action Plan — what’s new, what’s not, and what’s next.

Ascribing indifference or, at worst, malevolent motives to career attorneys who are unable to refute such claims as they are bound by privilege is truly disappointing.

Joshua Geltzer, Jenny Marron, and Sam Winter-Levy join Brianna Rosen on the Just Security podcast to discuss the Trump administration's AI Action Plan.

Congress has revealed itself less as a coequal branch and more as an accomplice in the marginalization of its own constitutional role in foreign and national security policy.

Coverage of key developments, including in concise “What Just Happened” expert explainers, legal and policy analysis, and more. Check back frequently for updates.

Highlights of podcast discussion by experts on DHS, DOJ and Congress.

From export controls to the U.S. workforce, the plan’s decisions will have major consequences for the country’s AI development & deployment.

Costs for scientific progress and the public could be profound if the Trump administration succeeds in significantly cutting research funding.

CASA’s reasoning left open multiple avenues for litigants seeking to obtain broad relief against unlawful executive actions

Trump’s strike on Iran violated constitutional limits on the president's unilateral power to take the nation to war—an authority the Framers reserved for Congress.

After Trump v. CASA, the APA offers a path to nationwide relief against unconstitutional executive actions—without relying on universal injunctions.

Tracking the use of State power requires systematically identifying linkages between individual developments and broader trends. This graphic offers one method.