Department of Homeland Security (DHS)

Press Release: Department of War, DOT, DHS bar unauthorized drones at southern border; Hegseth vows to shoot down cartel drones.

The Civil Rights Division regularly announces investigations or even conclusions with little to no evidence of fact-finding at all.

The first-ever case brought before the Alien Terrorist Removal Court displayed the dangers the court poses to democratic rights.

Expert analysis of how the first-ever case put before the long-dormant Alien Terrorist Removal Court came to a close.

25 years after 9/11, U.S. counterterrorism officials are being asked to do more with less.

Social media disclosure requirements implicate fundamental First Amendment rights, and the public has a right to know why they were implemented.

Numerous federal agencies possess statutory authority to obtain a wide range of sensitive information without advance judicial approval or probable cause of illegal activity.

This syllabus supplement offers curated articles intended to be combined with traditional casebooks in a law or higher ed classroom.

An immigration expert considers questions that might have been asked at DHS General Counsel Percival's UCLA Law Federalist Society event.

Dani Schulkin is joined by Steve Vladeck and Jess Dawgert to discuss the first-ever case before the Alien Terrorist Removal Court.

DOJ's first-ever use of the Alien Terrorist Removal Court raises due process concerns, but could offer more legitimacy than current immigration proceedings.

The attempt to condition states' counterterrorism funding on changes to election rules is unlawful and likely to be challenged in court.