Department of Homeland Security (DHS)

The public, Congress, and the media should insist that the DHS's domestic intelligence practices be sunset, rather than expanded.

A pair of cables issued by the State Department that are ostensibly intended to combat antisemitism will inevitably chill or punish First Amendment-protected speech.

When part-time soldiers police their neighbors, federal authority displaces state and local officials, and strains civil-military relations.

Contrary to the Department of Homeland Security's claims, evidence shows the situation in Afghanistan has not improved. Deporting allies is unjustified and a betrayal.

The SCOTUS decision in FCC v. Fox TV emphasized fair notice, a bedrock requirement of due process that could shield students from removal.

When a court finally addresses the merits of the rule, there are strong procedural and substantive grounds to challenge its implementation.

The breadth and depth of support for South Sudanese across red and blue states has origins in evangelical backing for the young country.

The State Department's AI-enabled "Catch and Revoke" initiative will dissuade individuals from exercising First Amendment-protected activities.

The DHS I&A's new guidance validates an expansive view of legal authorities that permit abusive counterterrorism and surveillance powers.

Sending anyone from the United States to Guantanamo raises a host of legal, moral, and policy questions.

An assessment of the achievements and areas for improvement in the DHS's most recent AI use case inventory.

We asked experts what members of the committee should focus on in Noem’s confirmation hearing before the Senate.