Cyber

Neither banning Chinese advanced AI models nor ignoring their risks to national security will serve American interests.

Congress should build a durable private-public standing forum in the next National Defense Authorization Act.

This syllabus supplement offers curated articles intended to be combined with traditional casebooks in a law or higher ed classroom.

International law must adapt to AI-enabled ransomware threats to ensure accountability for the cumulative injury inflicted by their campaigns.

All highly capable AI models should be regulated through pre-deployment and ongoing testing. But any safety regime that works for domestic models should work for Chinese ones.

Recent U.N. discussions add a new forum on global governance and international norms on military uses of A.I.

Software ecosystems are strategic infrastructure, yet they remain almost invisible within national security risk assessments.

The administration must treat the program as economic statecraft rather than a vehicle for green-lighting deals industry would pursue anyway.

President Trump’s new executive order on AI regulation rests on broad executive discretion and seeks to bypass judicial accountability.

Trump's new AI executive order creates the scaffolding for a workable regulatory regime, especially for cybersecurity risks, but failed to make it mandatory.

Mythos is a harbinger of the dilemmas that AI companies & governments will face in enabling the safe adoption of progressively more powerful models.

When the consequences of one corporate decision can compromise the world’s digital infrastructure, industry self-governance is not enough.