Cyber

All highly capable AI models should be regulated through pre-deployment and ongoing testing. But any safety regime that works for domestic models should work for Chinese ones.

Recent U.N. discussions add a new forum on global governance and international norms on military uses of A.I.

Software ecosystems are strategic infrastructure, yet they remain almost invisible within national security risk assessments.

The administration must treat the program as economic statecraft rather than a vehicle for green-lighting deals industry would pursue anyway.

President Trump’s new executive order on AI regulation rests on broad executive discretion and seeks to bypass judicial accountability.

Trump's new AI executive order creates the scaffolding for a workable regulatory regime, especially for cybersecurity risks, but failed to make it mandatory.

Mythos is a harbinger of the dilemmas that AI companies & governments will face in enabling the safe adoption of progressively more powerful models.

When the consequences of one corporate decision can compromise the world’s digital infrastructure, industry self-governance is not enough.

The United States is underinvesting in a key piece of public cyber infrastructure that many depend on to stay secure.

An upcoming ruling at the Court of Justice of the EU will shape the course of European cyber and ICT supply chain security regulation.

The real test will be whether clearer policy guidance, legal authorities, and institutional structures follow the Trump administration's Cyber Strategy for America.

Stakeholders have a narrowing window to shape what comes next with highly autonomous cyber-capable AI agents—before capabilities increase further and incentives harden.