courts

Tracking the use of State power requires systematically identifying linkages between individual developments and broader trends. This graphic offers one method.

Enforcing the nondelegation and major questions doctrines can help curb the danger posed by sweeping authority concentrated in a president of either party.

While Mexico’s claims were set aside, the Court laid out new pathways to accountability, providing a clearer roadmap of which legal strategies are likelier to succeed.

The Trump administration's efforts to circumvent the APA's notice-and-comment requirements risk setting a damaging precedent.

Alongside its democratic commitments, France should also reckon with the human rights consequences of its Libya foreign policy and interference in the post-Sarkozy era.

Consolidating cases allows a clear, expedited path to Supreme Court review, helping quickly address matters involving executive orders.

Tying the harshest punishment the state can impose to the identity of the accused is dangerous speech that can increase the risk of intergroup violence.

A recent U.S. Court of International Trade ruling may distract more than it changes the course of U.S. President Trump's trade policy.

A recent court decision has made clear that reorganizing the federal government can't proceed through backdoor executive planning.

As quantum computing and AI advance, the legal framework governing corporate fiduciary duties requires significant recalibration.

Federal courts possess a number of tools to ensure the U.S. government is held responsible for failing to enforce or execute court orders.

A discussion with Rebecca Hamilton about the use of State power and how to identify linkages between individual developments and broader trends in press freedom and beyond.