Constitution

A deployment around an election that is perceived to be politically motivated would irreparably harm the military's standing with the public.

Military leaders must be able to provide candid advice, raise legal concerns and challenge questionable orders without fearing retaliation.

An examination of the constitutional, legal, and ethical constraints on the president when he exercises his power as chief prosecutor.

Soldiers should always remember that in a democracy, any domestic deployment order given on or around an election is suspect.

Erwin Chemerinsky and Aziz Huq discuss the powers that state and local governments can use to serve as a check against authoritarianism and federal overreach.

Just Security's collection of 100+ articles analyzing the implications of AI for society, democracy, human rights, and warfare.

Section 592 unmistakably conveys Congress’s intent to bar any kind of military interference in American elections.

Federal law and the Constitution are abundantly clear: efforts to involve troops in U.S. elections are anti-constitutional and illegal.

To combat executive non-enforcement, state attorneys general are using antitrust law to hold corporations accountable.

A series exploring the powers and authorities state and local governments have to check federal overreach and protect democratic norms and individual rights.

Gubernatorial opposition is a powerful and often necessary component of meaningful state pushback against federal overreach.

Unpacking the Office of Legal Counsel opinion concluding that executive privilege may apply to presidential communications with private advisers.