China

As the U.S. and China compete on AI, concepts such as export controls can no longer determine who leads in that or across a range of other emerging technology.

Neither banning Chinese advanced AI models nor ignoring their risks to national security will serve American interests.

China's new rules limiting the use of A.I. companion systems reveal a gap in how the United States regulates A.I. chatbots.

All highly capable AI models should be regulated through pre-deployment and ongoing testing. But any safety regime that works for domestic models should work for Chinese ones.

China's prominent role in negotiations over the U.N. mission in Afghanistan marks a shift in its approach to Security Council diplomacy and illuminates its tactics.

Recent U.N. discussions add a new forum on global governance and international norms on military uses of A.I.

Georgian Dream is crushing Georgia's civil society, courts, and opposition to entrench one-party rule and Russian influence; only targeted U.S. and EU sanctions can stop it.

Research shows that, more than military strikes or sanctions, authoritarians fear support for independent media, anti-censorship tech, and civil society.

The U.S. needs to lead a new export control regime -- coordinating with its partners and allies -- to constrain China’s ability to produce advanced and foundational chips.

With risk-based personnel vetting practices, U.S. AI labs can keep recruiting the world’s best researchers while safeguarding national security.

Shutting off ocean observation will reduce the United States' ability to see and respond to developments in fast-changing seas.

The administration must treat the program as economic statecraft rather than a vehicle for green-lighting deals industry would pursue anyway.