Big Tech

As the U.S. and China compete on AI, concepts such as export controls can no longer determine who leads in that or across a range of other emerging technology.

Neither banning Chinese advanced AI models nor ignoring their risks to national security will serve American interests.

Congress should build a durable private-public standing forum in the next National Defense Authorization Act.

U.S. tech companies should take action to protect the Afghan women and girls who rely on their platforms for online education.

This syllabus supplement offers curated articles intended to be combined with traditional casebooks in a law or higher ed classroom.

China's new rules limiting the use of A.I. companion systems reveal a gap in how the United States regulates A.I. chatbots.

Other middle powers should emulate Canada’s focus on the rule of law as a central principle of A.I. governance.

A proposed bill would help ensure that antitrust law does not deter legitimate collaboration on mitigating AI security risks.

Members of the Senate are taking steps to regulate and restrict how the Department of Defense develops and uses AI in its operations.

The administration must treat the program as economic statecraft rather than a vehicle for green-lighting deals industry would pursue anyway.

President Trump’s new executive order on AI regulation rests on broad executive discretion and seeks to bypass judicial accountability.

When the consequences of one corporate decision can compromise the world’s digital infrastructure, industry self-governance is not enough.