Immigration

A collection of syllabus supplements which offer curated articles intended to be combined with traditional course books in a law school or higher education classroom.

This syllabus supplement offers curated articles intended to be combined with traditional casebooks in a law or higher ed classroom.

Access the Immigration Law & Policy Syllabus Supplements via PDF here. Access the original version, published Sep. 18, 2025, via PDF here. Additional syllabus supplements,…

Dani Schulkin is joined by Steve Vladeck and Jess Dawgert to discuss the first-ever case before the Alien Terrorist Removal Court.

DOJ's first-ever use of the Alien Terrorist Removal Court raises due process concerns, but could offer more legitimacy than current immigration proceedings.

A close analysis of the Supreme Court Justices' opinions in Trump v. Barbara.

The attempt to condition states' counterterrorism funding on changes to election rules is unlawful and likely to be challenged in court.

Unpacking the Alien Terrorist Removal Court, what we know about its first case, and what to watch for going forward.

New data shows how mass firings, loyalist replacements, and pressure tactics are turning U.S. immigration courts into a deportation enforcement arm.

Federal law specifies that involuntary mobilization is to be used only to provide military forces for war or national emergencies.

The Trump administration's threats to First Amendment rights have inspired a broad front defending free speech, freedom of the press, protest rights and more.

How the Roberts Court interpreted a simple statutory phrase to give the executive branch license to undercut asylum protections at the U.S. border.