Rule of Law

The DHS can either carry forward in its history of bias or transparently mitigate the harmful impacts of AI on rights and privacy.

Human rights activists see Orban escalating repression of independent organizations and media, and they call on the US Congress to help.

The best way for the US and EU to support citizens opposing the repressive legislation is to refuse to accept its legitimacy in any way.

Practical steps, based on the Mendez Principles, promote ethical, more effective practices to end torture and reduce crime and violence.

Western leaders will have to respond quickly to deter the ruling Georgian Dream party from further repression against its opposition.

A close look at the lines the judge must draw - and is drawing - to steer clear of testimony and other evidence that could cause undue prejudice to Defendant Trump.

Some European democracies, including France and Italy, are imposing conditions, in essence siding with backsliding Serbia.

Drilling into the foundations of an idea - the 'plain statement rule' - discussed in Supreme Court oral argument on former President Trump's claims to presidential immunity.

Explaining former President Donald Trump's gag order in his New York criminal trial, the alleged violations, and the legal framework.

History shows the Supreme Court can come to a decision soon after oral arguments. It must do so on the question of presidential immunity.

The United States could use transitional justice tools to create a shared understanding of anti-democratic events and move forward with accountability.

The list of potential witnesses read during jury selection for Trump's criminal trial in New York could indicate the direction of the case.