Law of Armed Conflict/IHL

Until distorted ethical narratives are challenged, powerful states will continue to commit war crimes with impunity.

The humanitarian situation in Gaza has sharpened third states’ obligation to use their leverage now to reverse the trajectory, writes Dannenbaum.

A court case shows the complexity of weighing a constitutional guarantee against the obligation to protect the State in war.

Using amnesties, trials, and “parole boards” for detainees in northeast Syria would be consistent with the requirements of international law.

The current round of retaliatory strikes between Israel and Iran casts light on Israel's and Iran’s opposing political strategies, which also have significant legal implications…

How can international law, and the ICC's planned slave crimes policy, best account for the unique challenges persons with disabilities face?

Torture and inhuman treatment of detainees are war crimes. They also put medical staff in a severely compromised ethical position.

As the international arms trade volume increases, States must act more responsibly to abide by their obligations and the humanitarian imperative of preventing violence and suffering.

An analysis of the view that the ICC lacks jurisdiction to try Israeli nationals for conduct in the Gaza Strip.

US presidents of both parties have agreed for 60 years on the need to stop the spread of nuclear weapons. Trump has signaled he’s not so sure.

An analysis of the view that ICC arrest warrants against Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Minister of Defense Minister Yoav Gallant are premature.

Ukraine must balance its security interests while ensuring respect for international obligation in responding to Russia's "passportization."