Law of Armed Conflict/IHL

Understanding jus ad bellum necessity and proportionality is crucial to addressing concerns regarding the weaponization of outer space.

A revised registration process for international NGOs aiding Palestinians creates a chilling effect against criticism and accountability.

A synopsis of Israeli Supreme Court recent judgment, particularly relevant now that the government has suspended humanitarian aid altogether.

Guidance on how to conduct digital investigations into sexual violence remains underdeveloped, leaving a dangerous gap.

The President should understand that bellicose threats and unreliability as an ally may leave the United States poorer and more vulnerable on his watch and will frustrate his nuclear…

With major powers increasingly skeptical of international institutions, strengthening the Court's legal coherence is necessary for preserving its legitimacy

Israel’s decision to cut Gaza off from essential goods violates IHL and reactivates crimes charged in the ICC’s arrest warrant for Netanyahu, writes Dannenbaum.

Many of the emergency powers a president could unlock through pretextual invocations and arbitrary proclamations are injurious to a free, fair, and democratic society. The courts…

Israel's pager operation was not an indiscriminate attack. It was a strategic operation that achieved its objective.

Without smart and targeted oversight, the United States risks a Chernobyl moment — a public backlash that could cripple AI development.

State reactions to the ICC’s decision can shed light on their views on legal questions raised in response to the warrant applications, as well as on the Court’s legitimacy.

Reflections from Ukrainian and international legal scholars following the third anniversary of Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine.