Law of Armed Conflict/IHL

The DRC’s case against Rwanda could mark an important moment in the legal development of responsibility for proxy warfare.

The Pentagon's push to integrate AI into weapons systems exposes a critical gap: no one can agree on what "autonomous weapons" means.

Civilian infrastructure is not targetable merely because it is economically significant or politically useful to strike, but only when it offers a definite military advantage.

Applying Clausewitz’s principles to Operation Epic Fury reveals the war’s strategic design–architecture linking military action to political purpose–was deficient from…

The U.S.-Israeli war with Iran illustrates how thousands of merchant mariners, so desperately needed globally, increasingly are trapped at sea during times of conflict.

While the ICC does have real problems, the State Department's campaign against it is premised on a misapprehension of how the Court works.

International law scholars address some of the factual claims and underlying assumptions in Secretary Marco Rubio's op-ed on dismantling the International Criminal Court.

International law experts respond to the Trump administration's campaign to "dismantle" the International Criminal Court.

Members of the Senate are taking steps to regulate and restrict how the Department of Defense develops and uses AI in its operations.

German scholars argue that from a realpolitik perspective, commitment to international law is essential for States whose power is limited.

Transitional justice approaches in Syria must not isolate periods of oppression from the broader contexts that enabled them.

Governments and the private sector need to find the courage to apply reputational pressure on the UAE for supporting a force the U.S. cites for genocide in Sudan.