United States (US)

States must be vigilant stewards of their data — auditing what they hold, limiting what they share, and enforcing legal constraints against federal overreach.

Iceland may seek European integration partly as a hedge against a more capricious and unpredictable United States, and others may follow.

States have constitutional protections against commandeering and coercion — but face a new challenge when the federal government sidelines states completely.

State and local governments have constitutional and legal powers that can be harnessed to challenge repressive federal actions and to advance meaningful freedom and equality.

To maintain sanctions' effectiveness as a tool, governments should strive to implement them with clarity, consistency, and credibility.

As the U.S. and China compete on AI, concepts such as export controls can no longer determine who leads in that or across a range of other emerging technology.

Neither banning Chinese advanced AI models nor ignoring their risks to national security will serve American interests.

U.S. tech companies should take action to protect the Afghan women and girls who rely on their platforms for online education.

State attorneys general and local district attorneys can take action to uphold the rule of law in the face of unlawful federal actions.

Expert analysis of how Iran's conditions for reopening the Strait of Hormuz fit within the strictures of international law.

This syllabus supplement offers curated articles intended to be combined with traditional casebooks in a law or higher ed classroom.

This syllabus supplement offers curated articles intended to be combined with traditional casebooks in a law or higher ed classroom.