Russia-Ukraine War

With major powers increasingly skeptical of international institutions, strengthening the Court's legal coherence is necessary for preserving its legitimacy

Shifts in intelligence sharing practice with Russia would reliably signal that the United States is instituting a deep strategic realignment.

International courts must respect international law, also in dire times. The International Criminal Court’s denial of immunity to heads of third States does not.

To bring true peace to Ukraine, the Trump administration must understand that its interest lies in putting real pressure on Putin.

The Trump administration's decision to pause intelligence sharing with Kyiv may have significant national security ramifications - both for Ukraine and the United States.

Trump has inverted the U.S. approach to Russia and Europe. European leaders must aid Ukraine and take ownership of their own security.

The focus on open source investigation of serious international crimes often comes at the expense of more effective local expertise.

Reflections from Ukrainian and international legal scholars following the third anniversary of Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine.

Western leaders and foreign affairs officials face an uncomfortable reality: they have absolutely no idea how to lift economic and financial sanctions once a war ends and elongated…

The Russian invasion of Ukraine, and states’ reactions to it, are setting the stage for possible changes to the international legal order. In the end, this is a battle for a…

Існують різні переломні точки в історії, які визначили метаморфозу міжнародного правопорядку.

Chaotic inconsistencies risk undermining its own approach and suggest splits between “peace through strength” and great-power appeasement.