Nuclear

Experts analyze critical dimensions of Israel’s strikes relevant responses, covering nuclear diplomacy; strategic, security, and regional implications; and international law.

The White House's future BDA briefings on the Iran strikes will likely project certainty where analysis still urges caution.

How the growing politicization of the U.S. intelligence community undermines the integrity of decision-making on Iran and national security more broadly.

Why did Israel, and then the United States, decide to attack Iran now, even as U.S.-Iranian negotiations sputtered along?

Whether newly announced ceasefire actually leads to end hostilities will not change the new reality: a comprehensive agreement is less likely now than before the bombing

The constellation of forces in Israel, the United States, and beyond complicates efforts to find an off-ramp to the war.

The Israel-Iran crisis will be a key test for how the Trump administration handles national security crises and its ability to respond.

An assessment of the implications of Israel's strikes on Iran this morning for nuclear diplomacy and regional stability.

The Trump administration should focus on messaging pragmatic objectives for a deal and de-emphasizing U.S. efforts to exert “maximum pressure” on Iran while talks are ongoing.

Governments should pursue policies that aim to make the benefits of quantum technologies accessible to all, not just the Global North.

Stepping away from NATO would reduce U.S. leverage over European allies, potentially leading to more nuclear-armed states.

The United States will uphold its leadership in non-proliferation by refraining from unnecessary and destabilizing nuclear tests.