Law of Armed Conflict (LOAC)

× Clear Filters
600 Articles

“License to Kill” in Salisbury: State-sponsored assassinations and the jus ad bellum

Above: U.K. Ambassador to the U.N. Jonathan Allen speaks at an urgent meeting of the Security Council on the recent nerve agent attack in Salisbury, U.K. on March 14, 2018. (Spencer…

When Does the Legal Basis for U.S. Forces in Syria Expire?

The State Department announced earlier this year that the “full and complete defeat of ISIS” is a necessary condition for ending U.S. military operations in Syria. But Senators…

Salisbury Response Option: Take Putin to Int’l Criminal Court

What legal options are open to the United Kingdom in its response to the alleged Russian assassination attempt in Salisbury? A separate piece at Just Security will discuss whether…

Trump’s Explanation for His Administration’s Use of Military Force Due Today

As I discuss in a piece over at Defense One, today is the deadline for the Trump administration to provide a detailed explanation to Congress on its legal and policy basis for…

Cyber Operations and the U.S. Definition of “Armed Attack”

[Ed. Note: Based on Goodman's remarks at U.S. Cyber Command’s Annual Legal Conference.]

A widely accepted view of the UN Charter is that a State can use force…
Trump walks into the Roosevelt Room and shakes hands with, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Gen. Joseph Dunford, U.S. Army Chief of Staff Gen. Mark Milley, U.S. Marine Corps Commandant Gen. Robert Neller and U.S. Air Force Chief of Staff, Gen. David Goldfein.

Important Report by White House on National Security Due Soon

The executive branch owes it to Congress—and all of us—to deliver the answers Congress has demanded to do the critical job assigned to our national legislature and serve the…

Will the Next Use of Force “Transparency Report” be Transparent? Devil May be in Classified Details

Congress recently required the President to submit a report that describes the administration’s legal and policy positions on the use of military force and related national security…

Doe v. Mattis: Is the War on ISIS Legal?

Many members of Congress, including those who voted for the 2001 and 2002 AUMFs, feel they haven’t authorized the current fight against ISIS. Unless the executive branch prolongs…

Episode 60 of the National Security Podcast: TL;DL – This Is Why We Can’t Have Nice Things

An over-long episode with a short title to reflect a very busy–and somewhat bizarre–eight day stretch in the wide world of national security law.  This week, your hosts Professor…
U.S. F-35B fighter jets drop GBU-32 bomb during a training at the Pilsung Firing Range on September 18, 2017 in Gangwon-do, South Korea. The fighter jets fly above the clouds.

The “Shift Cold” Military Tactic: Finding Room Under International Law

It should surprise no one that evolving military practice raises novel legal questions. It may surprise many that the increasing use of “shift cold” techniques by advanced…
A Block 30 F-16 from the 416th Flight Test Squadron drops a Joint Direct Attack Munition (JDAM) during testing in January, 2003 at Edwards Air Force Base in California.

The “Shift Cold” Military Tactic and International Humanitarian Law

New technology allows for new military tactics in urban warfare. Legal questions have been raised about a military practice--called "shift cold"--in which an operator redirects…

“Reasonable Certainty” vs “Near Certainty” in Military Targeting–What the Law Requires

Former deputy legal counsel to the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Commander (ret.) Mike Adams and former Special Counsel to General Counsel of the Dep’t of Defense, Ryan…
1-12 of 600 items

DON'T MISS A THING. Stay up to date with Just Security curated newsletters: