Featured Articles

Ukrainian MP Oleksiy Goncharenko discusses the NATO Summit and the war with Washington Senior Editor Viola Gienger and guest host Lauren Van Metre.

How the growing politicization of the U.S. intelligence community undermines the integrity of decision-making on Iran and national security more broadly.

Enforcing the nondelegation and major questions doctrines can help curb the danger posed by sweeping authority concentrated in a president of either party.

Ideology affects U.S. terrorism prosecutions: ISIS-linked defendants tend to get longer sentences than those tied to other extremist groups or ideologies.

The Trump administration’s approach to human rights ignores the real-world downsides and missed opportunities of setting aside human rights as a U.S. foreign policy interest.

An expert policy and legal assessment of the U.S. strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities and what comes next.

As the Trump administration plans to weaken the CDC, Americans and the world will become more vulnerable to biological threats.

Part of our ongoing series on the Israel-Iran war.

Experts who advised a president on use of force answer a full range of basic questions on the conditions under which action against Iran would be lawful, and what options Congress…

The constellation of forces in Israel, the United States, and beyond complicates efforts to find an off-ramp to the war.

"Another legal framework – the ongoing armed conflict framework – is more factually and legally viable than the anticipatory or preventive self-defense frameworks."

Strategic implications of Israel’s strikes on Iran and key questions policymakers should ask to navigate what comes next.