<?xml version="1.0"?>
<oembed><version>1.0</version><provider_name>Just Security</provider_name><provider_url>https://www.justsecurity.org</provider_url><title>The Haspel Nomination as a Referendum on (Un-)Accountability - Just Security</title><type>rich</type><width>600</width><height>338</height><html>&lt;blockquote class="wp-embedded-content" data-secret="aHd5fzbqpZ"&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.justsecurity.org/55830/gina-haspel-accountability-torture-courts/"&gt;The Haspel Nomination as a Referendum on (Un-)Accountability&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;iframe sandbox="allow-scripts" security="restricted" src="https://www.justsecurity.org/55830/gina-haspel-accountability-torture-courts/embed/#?secret=aHd5fzbqpZ" width="600" height="338" title="&#x201C;The Haspel Nomination as a Referendum on (Un-)Accountability&#x201D; &#x2014; Just Security" data-secret="aHd5fzbqpZ" frameborder="0" marginwidth="0" marginheight="0" scrolling="no" class="wp-embedded-content"&gt;&lt;/iframe&gt;&lt;script type="text/javascript"&gt;
/* &lt;![CDATA[ */
/*! This file is auto-generated */
!function(d,l){"use strict";l.querySelector&amp;&amp;d.addEventListener&amp;&amp;"undefined"!=typeof URL&amp;&amp;(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&amp;&amp;!/[^a-zA-Z0-9]/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret="'+t.secret+'"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret="'+t.secret+'"]'),c=new RegExp("^https?:$","i"),i=0;i&lt;o.length;i++)o[i].style.display="none";for(i=0;i&lt;a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&amp;&amp;(s.removeAttribute("style"),"height"===t.message?(1e3&lt;(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r&lt;200&amp;&amp;(r=200),s.height=r):"link"===t.message&amp;&amp;(r=new URL(s.getAttribute("src")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&amp;&amp;n.host===r.host&amp;&amp;l.activeElement===s&amp;&amp;(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener("message",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener("DOMContentLoaded",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll("iframe.wp-embedded-content"),r=0;r&lt;s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute("data-secret"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+="#?secret="+t,e.setAttribute("data-secret",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:"ready",secret:t},"*")},!1)))}(window,document);
/* ]]&gt; */
&lt;/script&gt;
</html><thumbnail_url>https://i0.wp.com/www.justsecurity.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/GettyImages-84937792.jpg?fit=3000%2C2054&amp;ssl=1</thumbnail_url><thumbnail_width>3000</thumbnail_width><thumbnail_height>2054</thumbnail_height><description>One of the consistent themes of the Supreme Court&#x2019;s jurisprudence over the past few decades has been aggressive hostility to &#x201C;judge-made&#x201D; remedies,&#xA0;i.e., the implication of causes of action in contexts in which the legislature has not expressly provided for them. Among lots of other cases, this trend manifested perhaps most powerfully in the Court&#x2019;s (deeply [&hellip;]</description></oembed>
